[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant `e'
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: constant `e' |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:16:28 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-2.el3.7lanl |
>> Despite being a maths graduate, I can't think of any other such
>> constants
>> with anything like the universality of e and pi.
>>
> c. I don't think we have that defined in Emacs though, maybe physicists
> don't use Emacs for calculations as much as mathematicians.
Or maybe they use geometrized units
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_units). The universality,
expected precision (a 2% error in c or in Boltzmann's constant is
typically not much of an issue), and unique values (being independent of
units) of e and pi are the reason for their inclusion.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
Re: constant `e', Richard Stallman, 2007/02/10
Re: constant `e', Alan Mackenzie, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Jason Rumney, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e',
Stuart D. Herring <=
- Re: constant `e', Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', David Hansen, 2007/02/10
- RE: constant `e', Drew Adams, 2007/02/10
Re: constant `e', Chong Yidong, 2007/02/10
Re: constant `e', djh, 2007/02/12