[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:30:49 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.95 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Anyway, it doesn't work on Windows if .emacs is editted and
> saved as a multibyte buffer.
> Why not? It seems that the character should be decoded by visiting
> the file, and converted into the proper character code.
That part is ok. The problem is that the current Windows
code generates an event M-\351 instead of M-é.
"\351" will be different depending on one's locale.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/25
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31