Re: CVS is the `released version'

[dhruva]

Hi,

On 5/26/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't know how often I will have to repeat that point: a central
> repository requirement is something which is not going to work out
> well.  Packages should be able to know where they originate by
> themselves.

A quick thought:
Is it feasible/practical to have a keyword in the comment area of the
file "providing" the package with list of depedencies and their
locations? If the locations are not given, we could assume that it in
the same location where the main package is hosted OR is part of emacs
distro.

-dky

--
Dhruva Krishnamurthy
Contents reflect my personal views only!