[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:45:54 -0700 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Not about "checkout" which sometimes means "update" and sometimes "get".
Speaking of "update", vc-update needs to be rethought a bit.
Mercurial, bzr and git (maybe other systems too) don't seem to want to
do merges based on a file, but on changesets.
What should we do about that?
- Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11