Re: pretest, devel and bug lists

[Nick Roberts]

 > So we have exactly what you describe, except that bug-gnu-emacs is now
 > the "separate bug-tracker list".

In other words, not exactly what RMS describes.  I think it's overkill for
everything that gets sent to bug-gnu-emacs to have a bug number.  Some things
are fixed immediately and others turn out not to be bugs.  I think a
separate mailing list is a good idea.

Using emacs-pretest-bug for the bug tracker seems to make sense but then I
would suggest that M-x report-emacs-bug should then send to emacs-devel.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob