[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:47:37 -0400 |
I grant the
conceptual possibility that you assert, but I deny its importance. I
claim it is both extremely unlikely to come to pass, and that we can
deal with the process of it arising in other ways.
No one can tell for certain. The only relevant fact is that the problem
scenario did indeed occur for Linux. Whether it would happen with
Emacs, none of us can determine. I have decided not to take the risk.
- Re: Release plans, (continued)
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, tomas, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, tomas, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, tomas, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/20
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Paul R, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/16
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Johannes Weiner, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/17