[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:13:00 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:30:08 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > with its cryptic "[Confirm]" prompt, is jarring.
>
> It's a pretty minor difference. As for [Confirm] being cryptic, we can
> change it, of course
Yes, please change it, no matter what we decide in this discussion.
It is terrible from the HE point of view. Something like
[Type RET to create new file/buffer]
is needed, although this is quite long.
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, (continued)
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/22
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/21
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/11/21
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Chong Yidong, 2008/11/21
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Tassilo Horn, 2008/11/21
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/21
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Miles Bader, 2008/11/21
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, mail, 2008/11/22
- Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Miles Bader, 2008/11/22
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/11/21
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/22
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Juri Linkov, 2008/11/23
Re: C-x C-b and C-x C-f bugging about confirmation, Miles Bader, 2008/11/23