[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr workflow
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: bzr workflow |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:57:25 -0500 |
On 1/11/10, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 1. Am I the only one who thinks this is a little too convoluted? (the only
> > other DVC I regularly use is hg, and there the workflow is "commit+push"
> > instead of the recommended emacs workflow "commit+merge+commit").
>
>
> Nothing stops you from using the more advanced workflow.
what "more advanced workflow"?
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BzrForEmacsDevs
It might occur to you to save some effort by just doing bzr push
directly to the upstream master from inside the quickfixes branch:
cd $DEVHOME/emacs/quickfixes
bzr push sftp://address@hidden/srv/bzr/emacs/trunk/
Do not do this — it can cause history to be displayed in a strange way
in the upstream master, any mirrors or branches of it, and your own
branch later. Search for the word “hidden” in this mail for more
details.
--
Sam Steingold <http://sds.podval.org>
- bzr workflow, Sam Steingold, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow,
Sam Steingold <=
- Re: bzr workflow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/11
- Re: bzr workflow, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/12
- Re: bzr workflow, Jan D., 2010/01/13
- Re: bzr workflow, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/12