|
From: | Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: | Re: tabulated-list-init-header and glyphless-char-display |
Date: | Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:42:53 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 4/11/11 10:51 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Chong Yidong<address@hidden> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:31:51 -0400 Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
...
I suspect there will be other situations where it's convenient to use unicode glyphs in Emacs buffers. If we can design a sufficiently flexible system, I think this is a good investment. For example, one could imagine a version of table.el that displays ┌─┬─┐ │a│b│ ├─┼─┤ │ │ │ └─┴─┘ on graphical terminals, using the Unicode box-drawing glyphs, and displays the equivalent ASCII borders on terminals that don't handle Unicode.Then let's extend glyphless-char-display to provide this information. That is, for each character, it should provide display information both for GUI and for text-mode displays. It can do that by providing an option to have an element of the char-table be a vector of 2 elements, instead of just one value today. Most table entries will still be symbols like today, but we could have some of them be vectors, as in this case and in the case of line-drawing characters.
Rather than returning 2 values, the optional argument could be FRAME to indicate whether the caller needs that information for a graphic vs. terminal frame (nil would means the current frame of course).
I think this is better than the text property suggestion, because glyphless-char-display can be set once and by default, whereas with text properties each Lisp application that needs it will have to do that manually.
-- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |