[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
spam- or registry-related things in Gnus need cl at run-time? (was: CL p
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
spam- or registry-related things in Gnus need cl at run-time? (was: CL package serious deficiencies) |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:33:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Feb 08 2012, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * Lennart Borgman [2012-02-07 20:11:11 +0100] wrote:
>
>> There are things that do not work if you include cl.el at run time.
>> You may not notice the problems and tracking it down has been quite
>> difficult some times.
>
> About two weeks ago I noticed the opposite. I switched from Emacs 23.2
> to 24.0 and experienced that some spam- or registry-related things in
> Gnus didn't work _without_ run-time cl package.
Please file a bug report (for Gnus) about this.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, (continued)
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Eric Schulte, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Eric Schulte, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Eric Schulte, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/08
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, Drew Adams, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, John Wiegley, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Teemu Likonen, 2012/02/08
- spam- or registry-related things in Gnus need cl at run-time? (was: CL package serious deficiencies),
Reiner Steib <=
- Re: spam- or registry-related things in Gnus need cl at run-time?, Teemu Likonen, 2012/02/09
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/09
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07