[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:58:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Sounds highly hypothetical. If/when eww can be used to access such
> sites, maybe we can start worrying, but then even if you don't keep it
> in live data, the sensitive data may linger around in
> "garbage/free" memory. If you need to worry about that, you need to
> worry about a lot more than that.
It's a matter of how big the attack surface is. Leaving the data in
easily accessible structures indefinitely is a larger attack surface
than killing off the buffer where the offending data is.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- Re: eww, (continued)
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/18
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/20
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/20
- Re: eww,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/28
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/25
- Re: eww, Daimrod, 2013/06/26
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/26
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/20
- Re: eww, chad, 2013/06/19
- Re: eww, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/19