[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> You wanna bet? I prefer an environment where I know what can and what
> cannot happen.
So yo do worry about hypothetical, unknown problems (unknown unknowns).
That's fine, but hardly a serious argument against MSYSGit.
>> Those rules affects a given process. That means that the fact that
>> process `foo' loaded certain DLLs does not affect which DLLs are loaded
>> for process `bar', even when `bar' is executed from `foo'.
>
> I invoked 'make' from the Bash that was installed by msysgit. That
> 'make' hang. The same command runs just fine from the MSYS Bash I use
> for configuring and building packages. That's a fact. I think I know
> the reasons, but if you want to disagree and live dangerously, that's
> fine by me.
IIUC you invoked MSYS `make' from MSYSGit `bash'. As I said multiple
times, that's not expected to work.
>> It would be quick enough to run some common git commands from MSYS shell
>> to see if it works: clone, pull, status, log...
>
> I already tried, see above.
No, you didn't. As git.exe does not depend on MSYS.dll, the problems you
experienced with `make' shouldn't happen. And, indeed, invoking MSYSGit
git.exe from a MSYS terminal worked fine for the commands I mentioned
above.
[snip]
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David De La Harpe Golden, 2014/01/03