[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:14:46 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> That's almost possible already, because there is a Common Lisp
> implementation (say 90% complete) for Emacs, including a compiler from
> CL to Elisp.
Compiling from CL to Elisp means that the two aren't integrated, so
calling code from one to the other is not seamless.
Stefan
- Guile emacs thread (again), Christopher Allan Webber, 2014/09/13
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/14
- Re: Guile emacs thread (again), Grim Schjetne, 2014/09/16
- Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, mhw, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17