Re: Conkeror-like functionality for EWW

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> I'd like `next-error' and `previous-error' bound, if that's OK with you.
> They can take a numeric argument to indicate how far to move in either
> direction.  That would be useful either way, right?

Well, `C-u 3 M-x next-error' would just be the same as `3 TAB', right?
So if it's not absolute, it seems even less useful, and we already have
that functionality on `TAB'...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no