[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defending GCC considered futile
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Defending GCC considered futile |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:46:30 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> It's difficult to understand why LLDB support is unacceptable, but
> MacOS X support is fine.
I don't know whether the cases are similar. I am still waiting for
more information.
And I don't know whether support for LLDB is unacceptable.
I can tell you that IF I conclude that LLDB support is unacceptable
it will be because of factors that are different from MacOS.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, (continued)
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Florian Weimer, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, raman, 2015/02/11
- Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Richard Stallman, 2015/02/11
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Helmut Eller, 2015/02/09
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Florian Weimer, 2015/02/09
Re: Defending GCC considered futile, Perry E. Metzger, 2015/02/09