[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥ |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2015 10:53:26 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> ("_<" . [?≤])
>> ("_>" . [?≥])
>> Can the bindings be changed to these:
>> ("<=" . [?≤])
>> (">=" . [?≥])
FWIW, I agree.
> ">" is already bound to »
> "<" is already boudn to «
">>" and "<<" would seem to be better choices.
The shorter `C-x <' used so far made sense when we restricted C-x 8 to
something like Latin-1, but if we want to extend coverage, I don't think
we can afford such short bindings.
Stefan
- C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Yuri Khan, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Rasmus, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11