[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:03:30 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:07 -0500
>
> There's not a single change that has been done in config.bat in the
> years 2003 and 2005. maintain.texi says (in node "Copyright
> Notices"):
>
> To update the list of year numbers, add each year in which you have
> made nontrivial changes to the package.
>
> "The package" is GNU Emacs. There have been changes in GNU Emacs every year.
>
> We used to have a different practice, which you probably remember.
> We changed it this year based on Eben Moglen's advice.
That change of policy doesn't make sense to me.
- Re: bad copyright years, (continued)
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/12
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/14
Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01