[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:07 -0500 |
There's not a single change that has been done in config.bat in the
years 2003 and 2005. maintain.texi says (in node "Copyright
Notices"):
To update the list of year numbers, add each year in which you have
made nontrivial changes to the package.
"The package" is GNU Emacs. There have been changes in GNU Emacs every year.
We used to have a different practice, which you probably remember.
We changed it this year based on Eben Moglen's advice.
- Re: bad copyright years, (continued)
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11
- Re: bad copyright years,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/12
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/14
Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01