[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:26:17 -0500 |
> We used to have a different practice, which you probably remember.
> We changed it this year based on Eben Moglen's advice.
That change of policy doesn't make sense to me.
He's the lawyer, so we follow his advice.
The new policy is much simpler to implement. Every year, when we've
made more than a tiny change, we add the new year to every file.
Nothing else to do, except when we add a file.
- Re: bad copyright years, (continued)
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/12
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/13
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/14
Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01