emacs-pretest-bug
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bad copyright years


From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: bad copyright years
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:18:38 +0900
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.91 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa wrote:
> > years that I modified the code.  But, AIST keeps copyright
> > for all continuous years.  If we must list all years
> > explicitely in such a case, could you please update the lines
> > for AIST too?

> I've done my best, but I would ask you to check the files where AIST
> holds copyright to make sure that they are correct.

> In several cases, the AIST copyright had not been updated for many
> years (before Emacs 21), whereas the FSF one had. I therefore only
> updated the FSF years. You may want to update AIST years too. In
> particular, in lisp/language:

Thank you very much.   I've just updated all AIST copyright years.

> I would also draw attention to the following files, which have no FSF
> copyright at all, it seems. Maybe this is correct, I don't know:

> lisp/composite.el
> lisp/international/ja-dic-cnv.el
> lisp/international/ja-dic-utl.el
> lisp/language/greek.el
> lisp/language/misc-lang.el
> lisp/language/thai-word.el

They are written by me and not modified by any other
person.  So, I think it's ok not having FSF copyright.

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]