|
From: | Allen Halsey |
Subject: | Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Complexity of computing w/ Emacs [was: emacs-wiki-blog: what's that?] |
Date: | Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:44:58 -1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) |
Sacha Chua wrote:
Planner's complexity is like Emacs' complexity. Outsiders say, "Emacs is way too complex to be considered a simple editor!" We bonk them on the head, show them the menu bars and the tutorial, and teach them how to use Emacs as a straight text editor if they really want one. (Or as a flashcard program, or as a tetris game, or whatever simple thing they want to get started with.) But Emacs' complexity and wonderfulness lies in its awesome flexibility. It can be nearly anything for anyone. =) You can use planner and remember to journal. =) You can publish your tasks and notes on the same page. planner-rss can publish your notes as RSS, too. My blog at http://sacha.free.net.ph is done in Planner.
I'm a newbie emacs user. I'm intrigued by the power and flexibility of computing within Emacs. I've seen the amazing results you and others have achieved with publishing your notes and TODO lists using emacs-wiki and planner.
But extrapolating from my progress these last 6 weeks, I feel I have a two years to go before I achieve effectiveness in computing in a Emacs + Planner + Gnus environment. And even that timeline I'm not so sure of.
I think I'll eventually get the hang of elisp. That is not my main worry.My main worry is whether the efficiency of emacs UI can ever rise to that of a suite of dedicated GUI applications.
Consider, for example, switching between applications.In a GUI world, I have a buttons on my task bar for the applications I am currently running:
- Thunderbird Mail Client, - A Java IDE - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Application - A couple of terminals - An IRC client - A text editor with multiple tabs for keeping notes and TODO lists.To read mail, I click the button on my task bar for Thunderbird. Likewise for the other apps. Simple.
Emacs can subsume the functionality of all these apps in a single instance. That's one button on task bar. But I hesitate to embark on this approach because I am absolutely terrified that I'll click that one button and drown in a sea of buffers.
I think maybe I just haven't learned the right tricks yet. Should I run each major app in separate frames? In separate instances? Is using an alernate Window Manager like RatPoison the answer?
Allen
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |