|
From: | tps12 |
Subject: | Re: [Fgs-bs] Status and stuff |
Date: | Mon, 04 Aug 2003 12:58:10 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 |
Desired Username wrote:
I agree that it doesn't really fit in the server CVS (unless it did admin stuff...). OTOH, I'd hate to send people somewheres else to get the only client that works with our server. But I guess we could make a separate project for that. Python and Tkinter are Free, right?
I think we can add it as a separate module in the same repository.
Right, I wasn't thinking it would be. But the DoS question came up in response to your saying that we would "waive the right to ban any user for any reason". In a sense that would be right, but practically speaking if they are blocked at the IPlevel they are banned from their account.I'm trying to come up with a way to say this: "'The community' can censor you and even toss you out of a particular room but you can only be blocked from the server entirely if you launch some kind of DoS/exploitation attack."
I don't think there's any conflict. Any IP address that launches a DoS attack is going to be blocked; it's a network administration issue that only exists because of the nature of TCP/IP. As long as we don't associate the address with an account and deactivate the account, I don't think you can consider it a ban.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |