Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request

[tps12]

Desired Username wrote:
> 1) How would access be controlled?  The gamers? 
> Presumably everyone would be able to read the
> "official" commentary.  And the officials able to read
> the questions in the temp?  No, questions about that
> game should be visible in the SGF for later
> downloading.  This sounds like the shout/gshout
> distinction.  Hard to enforce.

What the heck is gshout? Anyway, point taken.

> 3) This reminds me.  Someone who is censored by
> another user shouldn't be able to comment in that
> person's games, either.

Okay, so censor lists need to be stored server-side. This relates to 
buddy lists...clients should let censor lists stay private, i.e., not be 
stored on or ever sent to the server. Which means you can *only* ban 
certain kibitzers if you're willing to let the Evil Admins know about 
it. Also, there's an issue of conflict. If A and B play a game, and A 
has censored B's mentor C, is it fair to prevent C from commenting on 
the game of his pupil?