Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request

[tps12]

Desired Username wrote:
> "Go-related shout".  I have no idea how that is
> supposed to be enforced.  I do like your idea of
> channels, though.  And if we had pro games, they'd be
> perfect (though maybe that already works
> somehow--haven't their been pro games "rebroadcast" on
> KGS?)  

Yeah, there's one coming up, actually. We should check out how it works. 
Anyway, clone games are a better way of doing multiple channels, IMHO.

> Hm, yeah.  I guess I don't have a problem with this. 
> Morally speaking, it SHOULD be more onerous to censor
> someone than to just be their buddy.

"Hello! It looks like you're trying to censor someone!"

Yes, that's right, a Clippy joke. My Slashdot t-shirt should be in the mail.

> Well, he could always comment on it later.  But in
> general, you are right.  What if there were separate
> channels for each player and they got only their own
> channels saved in the SGF?  This is perhaps going
> above and beyond the call of duty on the part of the
> censorship code.

I was thinking of this. I see where you're going with this...you don't 
want stalker types to be able to talk shit about someone while their 
target is busy playing, and then have that talk permanently recorded in 
the person's games record. Won't gojo deal with this adequately? I feel 
as though we should err on the side of an underpowered censor system.