[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request
From: |
Desired Username |
Subject: |
Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:05:58 -0700 (PDT) |
--- tps12 <address@hidden> wrote:
> Desired Username wrote:
> > Yes, that's exactly what I'm thinking of. But I
> think
> > we should be encouraging people to censor before
> they
> > vote to ban. Shouldn't we? If so, we need the
> > censoring to be almost as effective as a ban.
>
> Vote to ban? You mean gojo-hit?
Right. I was thinking of a hierarchy like this:
1) Maturely ignoring
2) Censoring
3) Banning
But since a Gojo hit doesn't actually ban whereas a
censor really does censor (if only for one person),
maybe 2 and 3 should be reversed.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
- [Fgs-bs] FEETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] FEETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request,
Desired Username <=
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/07
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/07
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/07