[ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd

[Алексей Подтележников]

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>> It turns out that since 2.4.3 the cubic deviations have been
>> estimated *after* UPSCALE, whereas conic ones have been evaluated
>> *before* UPSCALE.  This was probably the original sin that led to
>> the misuse of FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION that we've just fixed in
>> "cubic".  Let's fix the original sin now.
>
> I won't comment the patch itself since I'm not too acquainted with
> those intricate geometric details.  However, please resend your patch
> as an attachment; your mailing program inserts replaces ordinary
> spaces with non-breaking space characters at arbitrary places...

Ok. I'm resending the non-intrusive patch as an attachment. The intrusive
harmonization of the conic and cubic splines is to follow in a separate thread.

Alexei

freetype-2.4.3-upconic.patch
Description: Binary data