Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> I also consider conic0.png to be slightly better (I did the blind
>> test *before* reading Werner's response).
> 
> Yes, conic0 == 2.4.3, conic_0 == HEAD
> The attached is hinted rendering now.
> Look for differences between e's and o's.

The most notable difference is the rendering of `s' IMHO (e.g. at
23 ppem).  hinted_conic.png is much better; in this image, it's no
longer a personal opinion...

How shall we proceed?


    Werner