[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd
From: |
Алексей Подтележников |
Subject: |
[ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:13:22 -0400 |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> Don't hurry. Both Graham and Bevan are busy people (and me too), so
> it will take a while to get proper responses. However, I second
> Graham's request for images which help a lot in the discussion.
Attention: blind test. Check the quality of o's.
The better image is vanilla 2.4.3.
The worse image is the HEAD.
conic0.png
Description: PNG image
conic_0.png
Description: PNG image
- [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/16
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/17
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/17
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/10/20
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/20
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd,
Алексей Подтележников <=
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Leon Woestenberg, 2010/10/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/26