[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:12:23 +0200 (CEST) |
>> Don't hurry. Both Graham and Bevan are busy people (and me too),
>> so it will take a while to get proper responses. However, I second
>> Graham's request for images which help a lot in the discussion.
>
> Attention: blind test. Check the quality of o's.
> The better image is vanilla 2.4.3.
> The worse image is the HEAD.
I consider conic0.png the better image. However, the differences are
very subtle.
Werner
- [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/16
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/17
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/17
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/10/20
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/20
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/21
- [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Leon Woestenberg, 2010/10/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/26