Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd

[Leon Woestenberg]

Hello all,

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> Don't hurry.  Both Graham and Bevan are busy people (and me too),
>>> so it will take a while to get proper responses.  However, I second
>>> Graham's request for images which help a lot in the discussion.
>>
>> Attention: blind test. Check the quality of o's.
>> The better image is vanilla 2.4.3.
>> The worse image is the HEAD.
>
> I consider conic0.png the better image.  However, the differences are
> very subtle.
>

I also consider conic0.png to be slightly better (I did the blind test
*before* reading Werner's response).

Regards,
-- 
Leon