[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:30:11 -0400 |
AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY
This email is fully warranted against physical defects and poor
workmanship in its stationery. If this email is physically damaged,
return it to me and I will replace or repair it at my discretion. No
other warranty of any kind is made, neither express nor implied
including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of
Merchantability, Suitability for Purpose, and Validity of Currency.
Any and all risk concerning the actual value of this email is assumed
by you, the recipient. Even though I or my agents may have assured
you of its content, either verbally or in written communication, we
may have had our fingers crossed, so don't come whimpering back to me
if it bounces.
this email, if any, represented by this instrument remains my
property. You are licensed to use it, however you are not allowed to
copy the original email except for your personal records, nor are you
permitted to give this email itself to anyone else. Neither may you
allow any other person to use this email. Remember, you may have it
in your possession, but it still belongs to me, and I'm going to call
on you from time to time just to keep tabs on it.
This agreement supersedes all others between us, including the equally
ridiculous one you have undoubtedly pasted on the back of your
web-page, or concealed somewhere in your underwear. The location of
your version of this or any other covenant between us is irrelevant to
its inapplicability here. Only this one pertains, and I really mean
it. In fact, this one supersedes yours even though yours may say that
it supersedes mine. Why, even if yours said it would supersede mine
even if mine said it would supersede yours even if yours said... Oh
well. You get the idea.
You may decline this agreement by returning the unanswered email to me
within twenty-four hours. If you attempt to send it, however, you
have implicitly accepted these terms. You may also implicitly accept
these terms by:
1) Calling my ISP to inquire about the status of my account;
2) Thanking me at the conclusion of our business transaction;
3) Going to bed at the end of this or any other day; or
4) Using any toilet or rest room.
Please be advised that I have adopted a strict rubber-glue policy.
Any nasty thing that your lawyers say bounces off of me and sticks
back to you. Be further advised that you agree to pay my legal
expenses if I decide to sue you for violating this agreement or for
any other reason that might strike my fancy. Violations will be
punishable by fine, imprisonment, death, any two of the above, or all
three.
> I understand that it's more and more common to see this in larger
> events, but that feels wrong... I find this kind of policy
> condescending.
Why do you think it feels wrong?
Because it goes against the ethos of the GNU project, and it is
hypocritical, and void of meaning. Can you say what _exactly_ is
deemed "offensive" or "harassing"? I cannot, hence I cannot accept
this policy -- it is fully and utterly nonsense, nonsense for the
personal convictions of the organiser(s) to decide, and not only that,
but you have no means of appelation.
The policy prohibits citations from our own web pages and projects!
Can I cite the sex(6) man page (part of Emacs)? What about the virgin
Emacs? What if one uses the verb abdicate (to give up all hope of
ever having a flat stomach), what about the noun circumvent (an
opening in the front of boxer shorts, worn by Jewish men)?
How about the the Intel Rectium microprocessor that is designed to
actually fit the appropriate body cavity for "Computing Anywhere,
Anytime"?
Best regards, Alfred Llamas -- a 'generously proportioned' male (375
pounds) with a less than generous penile length (4 inches erect)
seeking a vendor of high quality inflatable sheep who can give away
free samples as I am unemployed from the end of next month.
- [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy, Jose E. Marchesi, 2014/08/11
- Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2014/08/12
- Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy, John Gilmore, 2014/08/12
- Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2014/08/13
- Re: [Ghm-discuss] The posh talk does not complain with the policy, Deb Nicholson, 2014/08/13