|
From: | Douglas Philips |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] =tagging-method and non-portable filenames |
Date: | Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:26:04 -0400 |
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 04:28 US/Eastern, Ethan Benson, replying to Joe Osborn wrote:
whitespace in filenames is absolutly forbidden in arch. removing thisrestriction is not at trivial as you think. reference the list archives.find . [_=a-zA-Z0-9[:space:][:punct:]].* works fine. Is the limitation on the usage of non-portable file names a basic assumption of Arch? Is there a workaround? Am I just a fool? This is equally not-working in larch and tla. Any suggestions?rename your files to not include whitespace.
This is going to be nearly a show-stopper for Mac OS/X users.I understand tla's legacy, but that is irrelevant to adoption by Mac OS/X users.
I am one too. I can't use tla for this reason too.Oh, right, if you can't get arch-id/arch-tag lines into existing files, what makes you think telling projects to rename their files will get arch/tla any more users? Sheesh, just make 'em all 8.3 filenames and "GET OVER IT" ("Th-Th-That's a joke, son" --F.L.) (I haven't had the time to try tla passed building 1.0, I've been too busy deleting OT Emacs emails ;-))
Just my "Oh well, I guess I can't use tla YET" buck two-fitty, <D\'gou
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |