Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Which cscvs to use?

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:30, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I see these cscvs trees:
> 
> address@hidden/cscvs--duff--1.0
> address@hidden/cscvs--devel--1.0
> address@hidden/cscvs--devel--1.0
> 
> Which one do people suggest using?  What would you consider as the
> primary difference between them?

majors was the original.
cduffy has been going for performance.
I've been going for usability and reliability.

My branch has a fully usable totla (as of this morning). Until last
week, I was still using larch, and hadn't encountered the totla
brokenness.

I think cduffy is merging my changes into cscvs--duff--1.0 though, which
is good.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part