Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

[Damien Elmes]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
>> Two of them take a -L, --log-message option.  tag doesn't.  It
>> should, shouldn't it?
>
> I suppose, though it seems less likely that people will use it than
> with the others, as the automatic message is usually good enough.
>
> On a related note, I'd like to add a `-s, --summary SUM_TEXT' option to
> the import command, like I did for commit (the doubled-text effect of -L
> drives me nuts), but import already has a -s option, and I'm not sure
> the best thing to do -- change the meaning of `import -s'?  Use another
> short option (-S?), but then that's inconsistent with `commit -s' (and
> the reason I like -s is because many other commands use `-s' as a short
> option for --summary).  Gah...

Well, if --setup on import was to be the default, the problem would
go away .. :-) But I don't think Tom's with me on that one.

Cheers,
-- 
Damien Elmes