gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla


From: Jan Hudec
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:44:22 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 22:31:09 +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2004, at 3:45, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >
> > > Darcs' cons:
> > >
> > > - darcs does not support patch signing (showstopper for me)
> >
> >     That's not *exactly* true.  darcs does support having signed patches
> > on send when using the following flags:
> 
> You are right! I've completely omited this since in comparison with tla's
> support it looks quite weak. i.e. tla support signing/verification for
> every transport AFAIK, at least I'm using sftp/http and
> signing/verification works well for them. So I should rather rewrite my
> original statement to:
> 
> - darcs does not support patch signing/verification except simple
>   email-based transport method (showstopper for me)

Arch does not support signing/verification for transport -- it supports
it for STORAGE. That's the key point. The signatures are stored and can
be validated at any point in future. Eg. after a security accident.

> >     While the signature isn't recorded in the patch itself or your working
> > tree (although the patch name includes the sha1), it can be validated
> > if you keep the source of the patch (i.e. an email archive if you're
> > using email for transport).
> 
> Yes, I will probably need to go to darcs mailing list to find out why
> signatures are not part of patch and why it does not verify automatically
> when they are presented (while using apply command), i.e. currently it is
> quite easy to apply unverified patches just by mistake IMHO.
> 
> Anyway thanks for the hint!
> 
> Karel
> --
> Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
> ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec 
<address@hidden>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]