Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla

[Alexey N. Solofnenko]

Yes to what? Both approaches are functionally equivalent. Darcs only 
checks signatures on unsafe mails, but other protocols should check 
authenticity themselves (anonymous users should not be able to check 
anything in).

For me a Windows support is much more important and in darcs world 
Windows is a first class citizen. Unless you do the same people will 
standardize on something else than tla.

- Alexey.

Jan Hudec wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 21:03:26 +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
>  
>
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Jan Hudec wrote:
> >    
> >
> > Yes, true, sorry for not so precise definition. The most important thing
> > is that signing/verification is transport independend while this is not
> > the case in darcs. In addition darcs patches are not signed in repository
> > but on export (by send command), which is showstopper about which I wrote.
> >    
>
> Yes. That is completely useless for checking integrity of your
> repository after the computer was compromised or when your harddisk is
> dying.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                  Jan 'Bulb' Hudec 
> <address@hidden>
>

A.Solofnenko.vcf
Description: Vcard