[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands.

[Gustavo Córdova Avila]

Miles Bader wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:25:25 -0800 (PST), Tom Lord <address@hidden> wrote:
>  
>
> > I don't know what that implies unless it's that discussion about these
> > commands might be making a mountain out of a molehill.
> >    
> Well they seem to be the subject of endless bickering on this mailing list.
> [...snip...]
> For advanced users and scripts, keep "move-id" and "delete-id" --
> their names make it clear what they do, and avoid confusing beginners
> -- and either remove "move" and "delete", or make them invisible
> aliases with a warning message or something.
>
> -Miles
>  
Yes, I also think that this is the best solution.  Specially because 
Arch is not a "better cvs/svn", but a different type of solution, a 
better one.  You can bring all that you learned with cvs/svn, but don't 
expect it to work exactly the same way.

It's a better solution implemented in a different way, and it should 
stay that way; not  be encumbered with tons of aliases in order to make 
it as similar to cvs or svn as possible.

These are just my 2 cents.

-gca

gustavo.cordova.vcf
Description: Vcard