[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and mov
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:07:21 -0800 (PST) |
That explanation made clear to me what the core issue is.
I'm not playing bug czar today but I have queued up your
message and will add it to the db tomorrow.
Thanks,
-t
X-42-Virus-Scanned: by 42 Antivirus -- Found to be clean.
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2-42mail (2004-11-16) on
mail.42inc.com
X-Spam-DCC: sonic.net: mail 1117; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_BY_IP
autolearn=ham version=3.0.2-42mail
X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4
X-TFF-CGPSA-Filter: Scanned
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=NepY6LLzYmKQDSdPPD1U/CljbozFosBoEAgTqU9nN4fH+6A6eqgUuxXpcH6f+iMgw3lPZ2c/3mZa24oIfFf43lMGEua4WG0hg5QHxABP43QTrHMdDjLQFNmy5GSooiWyYmLi59D8UZnVFVcByRJO1qQ6qR5WIfOPuObDFEfBL/c=
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:09:52 +0900
From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
Reply-To: address@hidden, address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:25:25 -0800 (PST), Tom Lord <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't know what that implies unless it's that discussion about these
> commands might be making a mountain out of a molehill.
Well they seem to be the subject of endless bickering on this mailing list.
The presence of "move" and "delete" clearly causes confusion for
beginners, as they think that "mv" and "move" are synonyms (and "rm"
and "delete"); given that people generally want to use "mv" and "rm"
anyway, it seems quite silly to confuse them this way.
For advanced users and scripts, keep "move-id" and "delete-id" --
their names make it clear what they do, and avoid confusing beginners
-- and either remove "move" and "delete", or make them invisible
aliases with a warning message or something.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: Re: GNU Arch status update, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update, conrad, 2005/02/07
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Tom Lord, 2005/02/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Miles Bader, 2005/02/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands, Dimitrie O. Paun, 2005/02/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands., Gustavo Córdova Avila, 2005/02/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands,
Tom Lord <=
Message not available