[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Configuration file versioning
From: |
Mikhael Goikhman |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Configuration file versioning |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:33:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On 18 Feb 2005 15:33:53 +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
>
> Sascha Ziemann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I tried Subversion but after a checkout my shadow file was world
> > readable. Is it the same with Arch?
>
> No, Arch versions file permission as well as the file contents (but
> not ACLs).
>
> (I thought subversion was able to do this too.)
I possibly contributed to this confusion. My "Revision Control Systems"
slides stated in August that Subversion supports file permissions:
http://migo.sixbit.org/papers/Revision_Control_Systems/
AFAIK, Subversion only supports executable flag, just like CVS.
BTW, I reran this presentation two days ago on our local Perl Conference.
A typical feedback was: it sounds like Arch is really good, but I can't
suggest to employ it in my company, since it is problematic on Windows.
I was only able to reply that hopefully some complete "Arch for Windows"
distribution will appear soon.
Regards,
Mikhael.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Configuration file versioning, Sascha Ziemann, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Configuration file versioning, Robin Green, 2005/02/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Configuration file versioning, Matthieu Moy, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Configuration file versioning,
Mikhael Goikhman <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Configuration file versioning, Matthew Palmer, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Configuration file versioning, James Blackwell, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Configuration file versioning, Kamil Jońca, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Configuration file versioning, Jan Hudec, 2005/02/21