Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users

[Andrew Suffield]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0100, Toby White wrote:
> Otherwise I'll stick with old tla versions for the moment, and
> start thinking about migrating elsewhere - does anyone have any
> recommendations for modern VC systems with very small dependency
> lists?

You probably want to be looking at git. The next version of arch would
have been a git variation. It needs zlib, openssl, GNU diff, some bits
from rcs, and also curl if you want http support. None of that should
be a problem on a unix platform.

I'm pretty sure that's where I'm headed next. git isn't as good as
arch but it's 'close enough' and appears fixable for the rest.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature