[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users
|
From: |
Toby White |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users |
|
Date: |
Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:53:48 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) |
Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Toby White wrote:
>
> I made a statically compiled baz, bundled with it's own binaries
> of the required programs for old linuxes and a solaris at work.
>
> I intend(1) to clean this up a bit and check that it least compiles
> out of the box on solaris, (any) old linux and hp-ux. Hopefully this
> would solve your problems.
Thanks - that would be very useful if you do get round to it.
--
Dr. Toby White
Dept. of Earth Sciences, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ. UK
Email: <address@hidden>
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Toby White, 2005/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Aaron Bentley, 2005/09/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users, Fredrik Lundh, 2005/09/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users, Martin Pool, 2005/09/09
[Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Ludovic Courtès, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Jan Hudec, 2005/09/09
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Matthieu MOY, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', James Blackwell, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Andrew Suffield, 2005/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, John A Meinel, 2005/09/09