[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners...
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners... |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:48:46 +0200 |
Contributors sometimes contribute poorly designed features that
nevertheless satisfy some demand-of-the-day --- it's problematic to
just accept those because it effects the long-term health of the
project.
Then the maintainer should say so, and maybe suggest a different
solution.
(1) is problematic when you get to the situation I found myself in:
a fire-hose stream of problematic fixes from an uncooperative
source.
You should simply reject those fixes (with a explanation of why).
Which you did. And I don't blame you.
How much time is a maintainer supposed to spend saying what is
wrong, and being ignored, or fixing it themselves, before giving
up?
Just ignore the broken fixes/features, there is nothing to fret about
if you have a bunch of people who are simply unwilling to listen.
Maintaining a project takes up a lot of time/money.
I disagree, it takes a lot of patience though.
Anyway, this is a waste of time in my opinion. These keystrokes could
have been spent on something else.
[Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners..., Thomas Lord, 2005/10/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners..., Thomas Lord, 2005/10/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners..., Thomas Lord, 2005/10/12