[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:44:57 +0200 (CEST) |
address@hidden writes:
> >> ... It looks like lexical scoping rather
> >> than dynamic binding is the order of the day in lilypond, and I wonder
> >> if over all, from the user perspective, if it wouldn't be better ---
> >> simpler if a different binding method were used. Perhaps message
> >> passing would improve the situation.
>
> I have read over what you (Scott) wrote several times and have tried
> unsuccessfully to see a situation where dynamic scoping would be better
> (in *any* way) to lexical scoping. I can accept this as a shortcoming
The remark is all the more puzzling since \property is dynamically
scoped: by doing a staff-switch, you can change the \property value
that a voice sees.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Scott Ballantyne, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Mats Bengtsson, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Scott Ballantyne, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Mats Bengtsson, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, Scott Ballantyne, 2000/09/21
Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance?, David R. Linn, 2000/09/21
message passing..., Scott Ballantyne, 2000/09/22
Re: message passing..., Mats Bengtsson, 2000/09/22