|
From: | Lars Segerlund |
Subject: | Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted ! |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:40:55 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9 |
I would say that we keep it simple in the beginning, so if we keep away from the 'non generic' thread stuff we should be fine with most thread libraries, perhaps we should look at some other software which has to support different thread libraries ?
With some luck we could end up with something that autoconf can handle :-) ...
Any sugestions ? Steven Bosscher wrote: [ snip ]
It is an interesting discussion point which library we should target first. IMO it should be one that most people in our "target audience" have at their disposal. I guess that would be LinuxThreads, and since NPTL is mostly backward compatible with that library, I would like to see the first low-level runtime should be based on LinuxThreads. It would even be better if we knew how manu thread models are in use and how they differ. I would volunteer if I knew where to start... Greetz Steven
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |