[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M? |
Date: |
25 Apr 2003 17:57:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.93 |
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il> writes:
>> From: Phillip Lord <p.lord@russet.org.uk> Newsgroups:
>> gnu.emacs.help Date: 25 Apr 2003 16:43:43 +0100
>>
>> The fundamental difficulty, is I think, that there are so many
>> possible combinations of tools.
Eli> Right, that's what I wrote in my message as well.
And I in mine!
>> I'm just relating my experience.
Eli> Sure, I don't intend to argue with your experience. I think we
Eli> basically agree that setting this up is not easy, we just might
Eli> disagree a bit about how hard is it.
Now that I know most of the pitfalls, its generally not too hard. I
seem to remember discovering the pitfalls was a pain though, and I
still haven't got through all of them I am sure.
Cheers
Phil
- NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Galen Boyer, 2003/04/23
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/24
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Phillip Lord, 2003/04/24
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Phillip Lord, 2003/04/25
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/25
- Message not available
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Phillip Lord, 2003/04/25
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/25
- Message not available
- Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?,
Phillip Lord <=
Message not available
Re: NTEmacs, CVS, PCL-CVS, Version Control and ^M?, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/25