Re: GDP: LSR and @commonprop

[Graham Percival]

John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 décembre 2007 à 14:57 +0100, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
> > 2007/12/6, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > > AFAIK, most of the @commonprop aren't translated anyway, so this isn't
> > > really a regression.
> > ??? I don't understand. In the former User Manual, we used to
> > translate everything we could, didn't we?

In the _former_ User Manual.  The GDP docs are significantly different, 
and you haven't even started translating the new tutorial yet.  (since 
it's not officially finished yet).

I expect it'll be about a year until you should usefully worry about 
translating the snippets, since there's so much more material in the 
rest of the docs.  And the main doc text is more important than the 
snippets.

> Yes, we did.  If we go this way moving many stuff to LSR (which I fully
> agree), we *must* i18n LSR.  I volunteer to help with this during my
> Christmas vacation, if Sebastiano accepts to make this big change to
> LSR.  I guess this is not trivial work, so it might take a couple of
> weeks to achieve this.  Sebastiano, what do you think?

For the purpose of evaluating how much time/effort you have, I would 
assume that Sebastiano is too busy to help.  As I stated above, I don't 
think that this is the highest-priority item floating around... but it's 
your time, of course.  It's completely up to you how you spend it.
FWIW, I've added this to the GDP technical todo list.

(it's my nature to be pessimistic about the amount of extra help, and 
the difficulty of any task.  So far I haven't been disappointed.  :)

Cheers,
- Graham