[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: input/new status?
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: input/new status? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:24:43 +0100 |
Happy new year to all LilyPond hackers and users!
Le dimanche 30 décembre 2007 à 07:24 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Because I didn't know how to not compile them, while still having
> 'make dist' work. I also didn't want to edit makefiles whenever I
> added an extra file (ie adding that file to EXTRA_DIST as well).
>
> I'm sure that these technical problems can be worked around;
> please do so. There's no documentation / end-user reason why we
> build input/new/ stuff.
EXTRA_DIST_FILES=$(call src-wildcard,*.ly) does the job.
I've commited to master the big cataclysm on input/lsr I made last week;
I've updated snippets, make, make web and make dist are OK.
Any comments and criticisms are welcome.
Cheers,
John
- Re: input/new status?,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: input/new status?, Graham Percival, 2008/01/01
- Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), John Mandereau, 2008/01/02
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/03
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), John Mandereau, 2008/01/03
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/04
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), John Mandereau, 2008/01/05
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), Graham Percival, 2008/01/06
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/06
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), John Mandereau, 2008/01/06
- Re: Snippets status (was Re: input/new status?), John Mandereau, 2008/01/06