[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilybuntu confusion
From: |
Carl D. Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: lilybuntu confusion |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:08:37 -0600 |
Mark,
Thanks for the updated feedback!
On 7/1/09 8:59 AM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:>
>>> Yep, sounds good. Would you prefer that I send text for review
>>> and then create the patch when we like it, or should I just
>>> create a patch to be reviewed?
>>
>> You're a Doc editor, so why don't you just create a patch. I'll
>> review it once it's created.
>
> Jon, sorry if I upset you with my "grievances" yesterday. Just so
> you know, Bertalan Fodor graciously helped me off-list and things
> seem back to normal, so there's no need to worry.
>
> And thank you for the .iso and the great work you put into it! A
> few glitches on my (temperamental) computer shouldn't diminish
> that.
Actually, you are somebody-Mark, not somebody-not-Mark!
>
> But as not-somebody-not-Mark, I'd like to make one tiny suggestion.
> I think it would be helpful if no step was omitted. Assume the
> reader has *no* context to understand the consequence or relevance
> of any step.
>
> For example, when you say "allocate memory and so forth", that's
> about 5 steps that could be spelled out.
>
> 1) Memory: use the recommended base size of 384 MB?
> * are there system requirements for compiling LilyPond?
> * Do I need more RAM to compile the program than I would to
> compile just the docs?
> * I initially selected 384, but then VirtualBox warned me that
> 384 MB is more than 75% of all my RAM (I'm on an older
> computer with only 504 MB RAM). That would've left 120 MB for
> everything else and the warning said that was a bad idea. But
> I didn't know what to lower it to, or if I could lower it at
> all. So I changed the 384 to 200. I still don't know if it
> matters.
As long as there's enough memory to run things, you're OK. Extra memory
needs will be met by using virtual memory (on the hard disk).
>
> 2) Boot Hard Disk (Primary Master): select
> Create new hard disk: select
>
> 3) Storage type: Dynamically exapanding storage?
>
> 4) Virtual Location Disk Location: use recommended location
>
> 5) Virtual Location Disk Size: use recommended (8 GB)?
> * Does compiling LilyPond require more/less?
> * What if I only want to allocate 2GB (hypothetically)?
> * If I select 8GB, it'll start at the base size in expand
> dynamically anyway, right? It would be good to understand
> this.
Probably want to use the recommended. 2GB may make it too tight.
>
> Hope this helps.
The feedback is *always* helpful.
Carl
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Graham Percival, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion,
Carl D. Sorensen <=
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, ArnoWaschk, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Graham Percival, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Graham Percival, 2009/07/02
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/03