[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font"
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font" |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:33:55 +0100 |
2009/7/10 Mark Polesky <address@hidden>:
> I was having trouble finding glyphs in NR B.6, so I reorganized
> things. I'm not saying I used the best approach, but I think this
> would be an improvement. Any comments or suggestions? A better
> approach? See the attached file.
I like it. Though it sacrifices a bit of maintainability, I think
it's worth it when it looks so good.
One thing I don't like is the (begin ...) form though, especially
since there's no indentation for the helper functions inside.
Don't forget to include the petrucci and (neo)mensural glyphs. ;)
Regards,
Neil
- improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/10
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Graham Percival, 2009/07/10
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font",
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/10
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/10
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/11
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/11
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/11
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/11
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/12
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Neil Puttock, 2009/07/12
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/12
- Re: improving NR B.6 "The Feta Font", Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/12