|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: G clef changes [was: Re: Alternative music font] |
Date: | Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:37:24 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 12/30/09 7:42 AM, "Marc Hohl" <address@hidden> wrote:Carl Sorensen schrieb:On 12/30/09 6:06 AM, "Marc Hohl" <address@hidden> wrote:@Carl: I am not at all familiar with SVG. Could you please produce a file similar to the one you sent already with different rotating angles?I can only produce a file like that with the clefs you have designed if you generate svg output instead of (or in addition to) the pdf output. Use lilypond -fsvg myfile.ly in order to generate svg output (see Command line options for lilypond in section 1.2 of Usage).Oh, sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I meant you to create this file with the original liypond clef. Then we can find the ideal rotating angle, and I'll implement that in metafont.OK, I've attached a 300 dpi png and with the clef rotated from 0 to 4 degrees.
Thanks for your work, Carl.
OT: This is strange; in the browser, it looks ok, but with inkscape, the staff lines are missing.An Inkscape svg is available at http://www.et.byu.edu/~sorensen/cleftest.svg
But that's not important, because:
I printed this and stared at the clefs for quite a long time. I am not sure to use the 1.5 version as it is, or the 2.0 version with a tiny shift of the bulb to the right.A 600-dpi png is available at http://www.et.byu.edu/~sorensen/cleftest.png
But I tend to claim 1.5 being the best. I'll dive into the metafont sources to rotate the clef. Marc
In reviewing these, I think a rotation of the whole clef by 1.5 degrees would look just about perfect. HTH, Carl
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |